UK says dangerous to send NATO troops to Ukraine



UK says dangerous to send NATO troops to Ukraine

The presence of Western combat personnel would lead to further escalation, Foreign Secretary David Cameron said

The UK foreign secretary has spoken out against sending soldiers from NATO countries to Ukraine to fight the Russian army, amid calls from some European leaders for more direct involvement in the conflict.

Speaking to Sky News on Friday, David Cameron said the UK keep supplying weapons to Kiev and focus on replenishing its own stocks "as a national priority."

"But I wouldn't have NATO soldiers in the country because I think that could be a dangerous escalation," the prime minister added. "We've trained - I think - almost 60,000 Ukrainian soldiers."

This week, French President Emmanauel Macron once again refused to rule out a potential deployment in Ukraine. "We mustn't rule anything out because our objective is that Russia must never be able to win in Ukraine," he told the Economist.

Macron argued that the question of NATO boots on the ground could arise "if the Russians were to break through the front lines" and if Kiev were to request help.

Other high-ranking European officials have floated the idea of troop deployments, with some suggesting that the US-led military alliance could send demining squads and other non-combat personnel. "The presence of NATO forces in Ukraine is not unthinkable," Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski told reporters in March.

However, other NATO countries, notably Hungary and Slovakia, have spoken out against any further escalation.

"If a NATO member commits ground troops, it will be a direct NATO-Russia confrontation and it will then be World War III," Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto told French broadcaster LCI on Thursday.

Moscow has repeatedly warned that it would be forced to attack Western troops if they take part in the conflict. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram on Friday that "nothing will remain" of NATO forces if they are sent to the front line in Ukraine.

Kiev has sounded the alarm over the delays in Western military aid in recent months, blaming ammunition shortages for losses on the battlefield.

In an interview published in The Economist on Thursday, Vadim Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's GUR military intelligence agency, said Ukraine's defenses could crumble even with the recently approved additional aid packages from the US and UK.

(RT.com)

UK says dangerous to send NATO troops to Ukraine

UK says dangerous to send NATO troops to Ukraine

RT.com
4th May 2024, 16:12 GMT+10

The presence of Western combat personnel would lead to further escalation, Foreign Secretary David Cameron said

The UK foreign secretary has spoken out against sending soldiers from NATO countries to Ukraine to fight the Russian army, amid calls from some European leaders for more direct involvement in the conflict.

Speaking to Sky News on Friday, David Cameron said the UK keep supplying weapons to Kiev and focus on replenishing its own stocks "as a national priority."

"But I wouldn't have NATO soldiers in the country because I think that could be a dangerous escalation," the prime minister added. "We've trained - I think - almost 60,000 Ukrainian soldiers."

This week, French President Emmanauel Macron once again refused to rule out a potential deployment in Ukraine. "We mustn't rule anything out because our objective is that Russia must never be able to win in Ukraine," he told the Economist.

Macron argued that the question of NATO boots on the ground could arise "if the Russians were to break through the front lines" and if Kiev were to request help.

Other high-ranking European officials have floated the idea of troop deployments, with some suggesting that the US-led military alliance could send demining squads and other non-combat personnel. "The presence of NATO forces in Ukraine is not unthinkable," Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski told reporters in March.

However, other NATO countries, notably Hungary and Slovakia, have spoken out against any further escalation.

"If a NATO member commits ground troops, it will be a direct NATO-Russia confrontation and it will then be World War III," Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto told French broadcaster LCI on Thursday.

Moscow has repeatedly warned that it would be forced to attack Western troops if they take part in the conflict. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram on Friday that "nothing will remain" of NATO forces if they are sent to the front line in Ukraine.

Kiev has sounded the alarm over the delays in Western military aid in recent months, blaming ammunition shortages for losses on the battlefield.

In an interview published in The Economist on Thursday, Vadim Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's GUR military intelligence agency, said Ukraine's defenses could crumble even with the recently approved additional aid packages from the US and UK.

(RT.com)